NOTHING LIKE BARAK OBAMA'S FATHER, Part 3
"All is NOT fair in Love and War (Especially when the "Theatre of Operations" is the developing minds of young children!), Continued:
As I explained in my previous blog entry, my ex-wife informed me of her intent to terminate our 13+ year marriage in October of 1998 after I admittedly neglected her emotional and emotional needs, which evidently led to her meeting a co-worker who began to give her the attention that she truly deserves - while I was primarily focused on my responsibility and privilege of being a "Stay-At-Home Dad" and the "Primary Caregiver" for our two, young sons, Evan & Ethan - And while I was otherwise admittedly obsessed with and consumed by my determination to build a successful homebased business (as a self-taught Fashion Designer) - FOR OUR CHILREN.
She had also discovered a few months earlier that she could become in position to inherit about $250,000 from an elderly Aunt.
My ex-wife was evidently convinced that I would almost certainly be given custody of Evan & Ethan because of the fact that I was (AM) blessed to be a very proud and loving capable [African-American] father who was (IS) a "Stay-At-Home Dad" and was their "Primary Caregiver. Hence, she was also evidently persuaded to falsely accuse me of being abusive toward her and our children in order to seize an advantage in our CUSTODY DISPUTE.
First, however, my ex-wife admittedly attempted to flee with both of our children on 1/24/99, but I prevented her and she called 911. Officer Hamill (Badge # 885) and Officer Gallipeau (Badge # 842) responded to her 911 call - DURING WHICH MY EX-WIFE NEVER ACCUSED ME OF BEING ABUSIVE TOWARD HER OR EITHER OF OUR CHILDREN (even when they basically invited her to make such a accusation to justify her attempts to FLEE with our children, by telling her that unless some type of domestic abuse has occured against her or our children they could not force me to allow her to relocate our children if I did not want them to be taken. She simply informed them that she did not want to be married to me anymore and that she wanted to leave and to take our children with her) - Then the two officers asked if they could call one of the RPD's Family Counseling (F.A.C.I.T.) Officers and we both agreed. Shortly thereafter F.A.C.I.T. Officer Mark Scipioni arrived and spent hours in our home listening carefully - DURING WHICH MY EX-WIFE STILL DID NOT ACCUSE ME OF BEING ABUSIVE TOWARD HER OR EITHER OF OUR CHILDREN.
The very next day, 1/25/99, my ex-wife again attempted to flee with just ONE of our children, Evan, who was then 6 years old (Ethan was 3). But I again prevented her when after Evan took the initiative to inform me that his mother told him not to get on his school bus after school because she was going to pick him up and they were not going to come home. But this time when I prevented her (by telling her I was not going to allow Evan to go to school that day) she stormed out of our home screaming that she was going to get our kids (custody) and that she was going to get me (threat). Then she evidently went straight to the Family Court and filed for a petition for (and was given) an Order of Protection against me. She returned a couple hours later, escorted by two police officers who were holding the Order of Protection and told me that I had a few minutes to grab some of my belongings and then I had to leave and "Stay-Away" (at least 1,500 ft.) from our home and from Evan & Ethan.
The TWO (2) specific examples of alleged abuse that my ex-wife cunningly alleged in her petition with the Family Court - THE ONLY TWO (2) ACCUSATIONS OF CHILD ABUSE THAT I HAVE EVER BEEN ACCUSED OF - are that: 1) I allegedly pushed my ex-wife and then elbowed Evan in his head on 12/3/98; And 2) that I allegedly put a plastic bag over Evan's head to discipline him on 1/3/99 - ACCUSATIONS THAT SHE NEVER THOUGHT OF OR MENTIONED TO THE TWO POLICE OFFICERS AND THE F.A.C.I.T. OFFICER THAT RESPONDED TO HER 911 CALL THE DAY BEFORE!
Obviously, if she did make those accusations the day before (and especially if those allegations were true) THE POLICE WOULD HAVE AT LEAST ALLOWED HER TO TAKE OUR CHILDREN - And they certainly would have called Child Protective Services - And they almost certainly would have ARRESTED ME - And the local MEDIA and perhaps even the National media (someone like Nancy Grace and the women on The View, etc.) would have absolutely jumped all over such a story!
I immediately went to the Family Court and exhorted the court to order a Child Protective Services investigation. And just a few days later my ex-wife was interviewed by C.P.S. Caseworker, Eric Worl for the C.P.S. Investigation Report which was Dated: 1/31/99. And in the C.P.S. Investigation Report my ex-wife admitted that we were having an argument because of our CUSTODY DISPUTE and that she was boasting about "bringing home the bacon" and that she kept poking one of her fingers in my face and that I responded by knocking her hand away from my face - AND THAT SHE ACTUALLY PUSHED ME INTO EVAN WHICH CAUSED MY ELBOW TO HIT EVAN IN HIS FOREHEAD!
And regarding the alleged bag over Evan's head incident: According to the C.P.S. Investigation Report, my ex-wife already began to contridict her own claims that she made in her Family Court Petition for an Order of Protection that she filed just a few days earlier! This time, SHE CLAIMED: "Ryan and Evan were talking about a small toy truck that had recently been purchased at KB Toys. According to Rebecca, Ryan, in a kidding way, said to Evan, 'If you don't like the toy then I'll take it back - better yet, I'll take you back to the store'. He then proceeded to put the bag 'loosely over Evan's head' momentarily. Ryan picked Evan up and held him over his head in a playful manner with the bag over his head. Rebecca stated that the bag was over the child's head for only 2 (two) seconds."
Obviously, keeping in mind the fact that we were in the middle of a bitter CUSTODY DISPUTE - Any reasonable or reasonably intelligent person can safely and accurately assume that my ex-wife would ALSO greatly exaggerate or embellish her accusations to C.P.S.
Furthermore, it would be virtually impossible to me to have, even "IN A KIDDING WAY" and "IN A PLAYFUL MANNER" put a plastic bag "loosely over Evan's head" - and then pick him up and hold him over my head, with a bag over his head - ALL WITHIN THE "ONLY 2 (TWO) SECONDS" that she now claimed a bag was over Evan's head!
BIGOTRY KILLS BRAINCELLS (AND CAUSES BLINDNESS)
If I simply stated that Eric Worl, the [first] C.P.S. Caseworker proved to be very prejudiced against me - an African-American Man who was accused of being abusive toward my ex-wife and our two, young sons, and that he was biased on behalf of my ex-wife and attempted to slant his C.P.S. Investigation Report in a way that would favor my ex-wife, a lot of people might not believe me.
So please permit me to stress the indisputable - CLEARLY DOCUMENTED - fact that Mr. Worl was so extremely biased on behalf of my ex-wife (OR SO EXTREMELY STUPID), and so determined to slant his Investigation Report in favor of my ex-wife, that he either grossly distorted or completely left out absolutely everything that I told him - AND HE ABSOLUTELY REFUSED INCLUDE ANY INFORMATION WHAT-SO-EVER ABOUT THE FACT THAT MY EX-WIFE ADMITTEDLY ATTEMPTED TO "FLEE" WITH BOTH OF OUR CHILDREN ON 1/24/99, AND THEN ATTEMPTED TO FLEE WITH JUST ONE OF OUR CHILDREN ON 1/25/99 - AND HE ALSO REFUSED TO INCLUDE THE FACT THAT MY EX-WIFE CALLED 911 WHEN I PREVENTED HER FROM FLEEING WITH OUR CHILDREN ON 1/24/99, AND THAT TWO POLICE OFFICERS AND A FAMILY COUNSELING OFFICER RESPONDED TO HER 911 CALL AND SPENT SEVERAL HOURS IN OUR HOME ON 1/24/99 (during which she never accused me of abusing her or either of our children and she certainly did not accuse me of elbowing Evan in the head or of putting a plastic bag over Evan's head, etc.) - All of that occuring just a few days before he interviewed each of us for his C.P.S. Investigation Report, which is Dated: 1/31/99!!!
Again, I humbly beseech each and every one of you to ask yourself: WHY WOULD A CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES CASEWORKER LEAVE SUCH EXTREMELY RELEVANT AND VITAL INFORMATION COMPLETELY OUT OF HIS INVESTIGATION REPORT? - I CERTAINLY INFORMED HIM OF ALL OF THOSE FACTS DURING HIS PSEUDO-INVESTIGATION, and my ex-wife probably did also.
PHASE ONE OF PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE (ALBEIT PSYCHOLOGICAL ABUSE) AGAINST EVAN & ETHAN SINCLAIR:
1st Phase of Propaganda:
Attempt to brainwash and convince children that their father is DANGEROUS, And RESTRICT OR ELIMINATE INFORMATION (the TRUTH) ~ Because "Knowledge is Power":
Nevertheless, even with the grossly distorted and biased C.P.S. Investigation Report, Ann-Marie Taddio, the Supervising Judge of the Monroe County Anti-Family Court, and Glenn R. Morton, one of the Family Court's Judicial Hearing Officers who was assigned to adjudicate the case, did in fact receive a FAXED copy of the C.P.S. Investigation Report prior to the first Family Court Hearing pertaining to my ex-wife's petition for an Order of Protection, which was scheduled for 2/1/99 - HENCE THEY COULD IMMEDIATELY DISCERN THE FOLLOWING VERY CLEAR AND SIMPLE FACTS:
1) My ex-wife and I was in the middle of a very bitter CUSTODY DISPUTE.
2) My ex-wife indisputably GREATLY EXAGGERATED AND EMBELLISHED(AND EVIDENTLY CONCOCTED) HER ALLEGATIONS THAT I WAS ABUSIVE in an obvious attempt to seize an advantage in our CUSTODY DISPUTE.
3) My ex-wife also admitted during the C.P.S. Investigation that THE ONLY REASONS WHY SHE WANTED MY VISITATION WITH OUR CHILDREN TO BE "SUPERVISED" IS BECAUSE: "REBECCA STATED THAT SHE IS CONCERNED THAT RYAN MAY ATTEMPT TO EITHER FLEE WITH THE CHILDREN OR THAT HE MAY SPEAK NEGATIVELY ABOUT HER TO THE CHILDREN AND THAT SHE WOULD LIKE VISITATION TO BE SUPERVISED." (NOT because of her [false] allegations that I was abusive or because she was concerned about their safety, etc.!)
STILL, the Family Court branch of the Monroe County Bigot's Brigade repeatedly extended my ex-wife's fraudulent, supposedly "Temporary" Order of Protection from one month to another for several months. And J.H.O. Morton stipulated that I would be allowed to have ONE, 1-HOUR "SUPERVISED VISIT" WITH EVAN & ETHAN EACH WEEK AT THE SO-CALLED SOCIETY FOR THE PROTECTION AND CARE OF CHILDREN (S.P.C.C., Each Sunday, from 4:00pm-5:00pm); And that I would be allowed to have ONE, 1-HOUR TELEPHONE CONVERSATION WITH EVAN & ETHAN EACH WEEK (Each Monday between, 6:00pm-7:00pm - a time chosen by my ex-wife); And that I would be allowed to have "COMMUNICATION VIA MAIL" with Evan & Ethan. Plus, that I would be allowed to communicate with my ex-wife, but only about our children's welfare. And before the "Supervised Visits" began I was instructed that I must not say anything to my children about their mother and/or anything related to the Family Court proceedings, and that I must also avoid asking my children any questions about their mother, or about her live-in boyfriend - not even whether or not my ex-wife and her live-in boyfriend was treating them okay, or if they were doing or saying anything to my children that upset them.
Regardless of how extraordinarily loving a father had been throughout their lives, can anyone truly imagine or dispute how devastating the effects would be in the minds of 3 & 7 year old children if they are told that the only time that they will henceforth be allowed to spend with their [African-American] father, and the only circumstances under which they would be allowed to see him - is for ONE (1) HOUR "SUPERVISED VISIT" EACH WEEK, and in a small, closed room, at a place called The Society for The Protection and Care of Children - with a stranger sitting in that room with them and their father, writing notes about everything they and their father said and did to/with each other? And with a 250-300 pound security guard sitting right on the other side of the closed door?!?
Soon after the "Supervised Visits" began, my ex-wife was allowed to (or encouraged to) begin thwarting with them. For instance, on 6/27/99 my weekly ONE (1) HOUR "Supervised Visit" with Evan & Ethan was shortened to only 15 MINUTES by Lauren Agness - BECAUSE (AS SHE EVEN TOLD ME), MY EX-WIFE'S [LIVE-IN] BOYFREND WANTED MY EX-WIFE TO BRING EVAN & ETHAN AND MEET HIM AT "FRIENDLY'S" SO THAT HE COULD TREAT THEM TO ICE CREAM (Of course, that had to be done during the time of my Court-stipulated "Supervised Visit")!
Also, during my "Supervised Visits" with Evan & Ethan, I always brought them various gifts - especially books. And, I usually brought them plants; live creatures (like turtles); and toy bugs, but I would not identify the species for them, because I then encouraged them to ask their mother to bring them to the library so that they could look for an appropriate book and do the necessary research to identify the plant or creature and also learn something about them that they could share with me during our next visit. I steadfastly endeavored to make each and every visit very enjoyable as well as very educational. However, My ex-wife evidently informed the S.P.C.C., and the rest of the Bigot's Brigade, that I do not celebrate birthdays or holidays because of my religious beliefs - HENCE, LAUREN AGNESS (THE GIRL THAT SUPERVISED MY VISITS WITH EVAN AND ETHAN) EVENTUALLY INFORMED ME THAT I WOULD NO LONGER BE ALLOWED TO GIVE MY CHILDREN ANY GIFTS AT THE S.P.C.C. - UNLESS IT WAS EITHER ON THEIR BIRTHDAYS OR DURING HOLIDAYS!
I promptly asked Lauren Agness if that was a new rule that was established for and applied to EVERYONE who had "Supervised Visits" at the S.P.C.C. - or if it only applied to ME? She would not answer. I reminded Lauren Agness that it was not too long ago when countless African-Americans were killed for learning how to read or for teaching other blacks how to read. So, as a matter of principle, I told her that I would not allow her - nor anyone else - to tell me that I could not give my own children BOOKS, or any other GIFTS that I wanted to give them.
I explained the same thing to Evan & Ethan, and I also reminded them about the story of Rosa Parks and the stand that she felt obligated to take several decades ago. And I continued bringing them various gifts.
As I explained in my previous blog, recall (or note) the fact that, while our children were ALREADY suffering from "Separation Anxiety" because of having me suddenly purged out of their lives, my ex-wife promptly sent our children's dog, "Nikita (an extremely sweet and gentle 10 month old female Great Dane) back to the shelter within DAYS after I was forced to immediately leave and "Stay-Away" from our home and from our children on 1/25/99 because of her [first] fraudulent Order of Protection - obviously because the dog had developed an attachment toward me - THEN, on 5/23/99, Evan (then 7-years old) came limping into the doorway of the small room at the S.P.C.C. where we were confined for our "Supervised Visits", and he was holding his right knee. I immediately noticed that EVAN HAD TWO DEEP WOUNDS ALMOST COMPLETELY AROUND HIS RIGHT KNEE, and although my ex-wife taught CPR at her place of employment, our son's wounds were dirty and untreated! I asked Lauren Agness for a First-Aid kit and I promptly cleansed Evan's wounds and asked him how it happened and I got my camera in order to take some photos of his wounds. EVAN SAID: "MADELINE (HIS MOTHER'S ROTTWEILER) DID IT", WHEN HIS MOTHER SENT HIM OUTSIDE ALONE WITH HER AGGRESSIVE DOG (perhaps so that she could have some private time with her live-in boyfriend) - And instead of showing any concern for Evan - LAUREN AGNESS (the Case Liaison for the so-called "Society for the Protection and Care of Children") was clearly only concerned about my ex-wife! SHE ATTEMPTED TO DISCOURAGE ME FROM TAKING ANY PICTURES OF EVAN'S WOUNDS, BECAUSE SHE SAID SHE '[DID NOT] WANT ME TO USE THOSE PICTURES IN COURT AGAINST MY EX-WIFE' (!!!) Understandably, I became indignant with Lauren Agness because of her lack of concern for Evan while shamelessly attempting to PROTECT MY EX-WIFE, and I told her that she cannot deny the fact that if either of our children were injured IN ANY WAY - WHILE IN MY CARE - neither she or anyone else would discourage anyone from taking pictures of their wounds then, but they could incourage it! - And if either Evan or Ethan was injured during one of their "Supervised Visits" with me at the S.P.C.C., SHE would almost certainly take some pictures of the wounds HERSELF, and she would absolutely write about it in her little notebook! - Then, I proceeded to take the pictures anyways.
Subsequently, Lauren Agness handed me a letter Dated: July 18, 1999, and this is exactly how it reads:
"Dear Joshua Sinclair:
Per our conversations in the past few weeks, no exchange of presents will be allowed BETWEEN YOU TOWARD YOUR CHILDREN at SPCC. This includes TOYS, BOOKS, CLOTHING, CANDY, ETC. Gift giving will be allowed on birthdays and holidays only.
You may bring activities for you to do with the children during visitation AS LONG AS THE GAME OR ACTIVITY IS BROUGHT HOME WITH YOU following the visit.
If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact me at 325-6101 ext. 217.
Sincerely,
Lauren M. Agness
Case Liaison
Supervised Visitation Program"
They then terminated my Court-Stipulated "Supervised Visits" with my two, young sons.
2nd Phase of Propaganda:
Create a stark contrast and attempt to win (albeit purchase) the children's trust, love, and loyalty.
(The Stockholm Syndrome)
Interestingly, but not surprisingly, during the same time that I was being warned that I must STOP giving my children "GIFTS" during my Court-Stipulated "Supervised Visits" at the S.P.C.C. - MY EX-WIFE'S LIVE-IN BOYFRIEND WAS EVIDENTLY BEING ENCOURAGED TO GIVE THEM GIFTS - And my ex-wife, and/or her attorney, and/or Lauren Agness and the S.P.C.C., not only allowed, but seemed to instruct my children to bring to our "Supervised Visits" various gifts that my ex-wife's live-in boyfriend purchased for them, like portable Nintindo games, and to tell me about every other gift that he purchased for them etc. Could it be that they were using Evan & Ethan as "pawns" in attempts to provoke me?
By the way, regarding the "COMMUNICATION VIA WRITING" that the Family Court also stipulated that I must be allowed to have with Evan & Ethan, I suspected that my children were not being given the mail that I sent to them so began to send some of the mail to them via "CERTIFIED MAIL" - And, not surprisingly, the mail that I attempted to send to my children via "Certified Mail" was returned to me, stamped: "UNCLAIMED ~ RETURN TO SENDER". And my ex-wife actually ADMITTED during subsequent Family Court hearings that she did, in fact, "CONFISCATE" all of the mail that I had sent to Evan & Ethan.
Regarding the "ONE (1) HOUR, TELEPHONE CONTACT, EACH MONDAY, BETWEEN 6:00PM-7:00PM" that the Family Court also stipulated that I must be allowed to have with Evan & Ethan, my ex-wife and her attorney repeatedly boasted to/in the Family Court that she had set-up a separate telephone number which would only be used for my children and me to have our one (1) our telephone conversation each week - HOWEVER, THROUGHOUT EACH AND EVERY ONE OF THE TELEPHONE CONVERSATIONS THAT I HAD WITH MY CHILDREN EVAN ESPECIALLY TOOK THE INITIATIVE TO COMPLAIN THAT HE DID NOT THINK HIS MOTHER IS A "GOOD MOTHER" AND TO COMPLAIN ABOUT HER LIVE-IN BOYFRIEND, AND TO COMPLAIN THAT HE DID NOT WANT TO LIVE WITH THEM ANYMORE! - Afterwhich my ex-wife could usually be heard yelling at Evan 'Don't tell him things like that!', while evidently snatching the telephone from him and hanging it up - While Evan (then-7 years old) could also be heard attempting to wrestle for the phone and crying: "No - I want to talk to him!"
And guess what? - My ex-wife and her attorney - AND EVAN'S AND ETHAN'S LAW GUARDIAN, LISA SADINSKY - also subsequently ADMITTED that MY EX-WIFE ACTUALLY "TAPE-RECORDED" EACH AND EVERY ONE OF THE TELEPHONE CONVERSATIONS THAT I HAD WITH EVAN & ETHAN! Obviously, they were hoping to aquire tape-recorded evidence of ME saying something that they could use against me in court - LIKE ALEC BALDWIN, ETC. - But their scheme backfired!
Nevertheless, to this very day, the Family Court has allowed them to suppress that evidence - And each of my repeated demands for the release (exchange) of that "EVIDENCE", under the rules of "Discovery" has been utterly ignored. My ex-wife and her attorney claimed that they gave all of the aforementioned tapes and transcripts of those telephone conversations to the Law Guardian, Lisa Sadinsky. And the Law Guardian simply refused to comment and also repeatedly refused to release the tapes and/or transcripts.
Nevertheless, because of the fact that our children (especially Evan, who was then-7 years old) repeatedly made unsolicited complaints about their mother and her live-in boyfriend and repeatedly complained that they did NOT want to continue living with them and that they wanted to be with me, and because of the fact that they could not prevent our children from repeatedly making such comments - MY EX-WIFE SOON STOPPED ANSWERING THAT TELEPHONE AT ALL DURING THE TIME THAT I WAS SUPPOSED TO BE ALLOWED TO TALK TO OUR CHILDREN (AND THEY OBVIOUSLY DID NOT ALLOW EVAN AND ETHAN TO ANSWER THAT PHONE). THEY EVIDENTLY BEGAN TO TURN THE RINGER OFF EVERY MONDAY BETWEEN 6:00PM - 7:00PM (WHICH WAS THE ONLY TIME THAT THE COURT STIPULATED THAT I COULD CALL MY SONS) - I often kept calling until after 7:00pm because no one would answer the phone between 6&7, and on a few occasions, my ex-wife did answer the phone (AFTER 7:00PM) just to shout to me: 'you know you're not supposed to call here after 7:00pm! ~ And I don't have to allow you to talk to them unless it's between 6&7!'
COURT-SANCTIONED "KIDNAPPING"
Using more of the money siphoned from her Aunt's Living Trust, my ex-wife and her live-in boyfriend soon purchased a new surburban home in Penfield, NY, and SECRETLY RELOCATED OUR CHILDREN WITHOUT INFORMING ME!
Not only did they refuse to inform me of their intent to move our children out of our home in the city of Rochester (where they were raised) - But they also refused to tell me WHERE they relocated our children to! A sympathetic Sgt. on the RPD subsequently did some research and gave me my ex-wife's new address.
Further, since, as I explained earlier, I was basically forced to live out of my van, I previously informed my ex-wife and her attorney to use my mother's address in Utica, NY, for correspondence purposes - However, my ex-wife's woefully unethical attorney seized upon that opportunity and finally filed a Petition for Divorce, and in an indisputably and unscrupulously sleazy scheme to prevent me from being able to provide the Judge with my side of the story (including my ex-wife's FALSE accusations of abuse; And my ex-wife's blatant and malicious TOTAL ALIENATION of my children from me; And about the injuries that Evan sustained when my ex-wife sent him ouside alone with her aggressive Rottweiler; And about THE TAPE-RECORDED TELEPHONE CONVERSATIONS DURING WHICH OUR CHILDREN COMPLAINED ABOUT THEIR MOTHER AND HER LIVE-IN BOYFRIEND AND SAID THEY DID NOT THINK SHE WAS A GOOD MOTHER AND THAT THEY DID NOT WANT TO LIVE WITH THEM ANYMORE; And about my ex-wife's FALSE [FRAUDULENT] "Joint" Income Tax Returns (for 1998) and her FALSE [FRAUDULENT] "Profit or Loss Statement" for my homebased business; And about my ex-wife's FALSE [FRAUDULENT] Financial Disclosure Affidavits, etc., etc., etc.) - MY EX-WIFE'S ATTORNEY FALSELY CLAIMED TO THE JUDGE IN THE DIVORCE COURT THAT I DID NOT RESPOND TO THEIR DIVORCE PAPERS - WHICH I, IN FACT, DID - VIA CERTIFIED MAIL!!!
Hence, while sitting in my van, near my store at the beach, I was "served" with a "JUDGMENT OF ABSOLUTE DIVORCE" which was signed by Judge Charles T. Maloy, and Dated: October 5, 1999
The [FRAUDULENT] Divorce Judgment was awarded to my ex-wife by "DEFAULT" - because my ex-wife and her attorney FALSELY claimed to Judge Maloy that I left and ABANDONED my ex-wife and our children and our home (another BLATANT LIE) - and that they were not aware of my whereabouts (another BLATANT LIE) - and that I did not respond to their divorce papers (another BLATANT LIE) - Thus, Judge Charles T. Maloy gave my ex-wife "SOLE-CUSTODY" OF EVAN & ETHAN - WITHOUT ANY DIVORCE OR CUSTODY HEARINGS EVER BEING CONDUCTED!!!
Despite the fact that "EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION" is supposedly the rule of law in New York State, the FRAUDULENT "Default" Divorce Judgment also gave my ex-wife "100%" of our "Marriage Property" including our "Marital Residence" and everything in it - even the rest of my personal belongings which I was unable to take with me when I was unjustly forced to immediately leave and "Stay-Away" from our home and our children on 1/25/99 because of my ex-wife's [first] fraudulent Order of Protection. I subsequently learned that my ex-wife then used her fraudulent "Default" Divorce Judgment to have my name removed from the lease to our "Marital Residence" and she (and her live-in boyfriend) promptly sold it.
Another egregiously unethical - AND UNDENIABLY ILLEGAL - aspect of my ex-wife's fraudulent "Default" Divorce Judgment is the fact that MY EX-WIFE'S ATTORNEY ALSO WENT SO FAR AS TO ACTUALLY ALTER IT AFTER IT WAS SIGNED BY THE JUDGE! - She actually changed the 3rd page so that it stated that I was ordered to pay $379.39 EACH WEEK for Child Support!
After I filed a Family Court Petition for Child Support Modification I subsequently obtained a "TRUE COPY" of the "Default" Divorce Judgment that Judge Maloy signed and I then discovered that Judge Maloy had actually rejected and crossed-out the amount of Child Support that my ex-wife and her attorney asked for ($379.39) - And he personally calculated and evidently wrote on page 3, in his own handwriting, authenticated (twice) with his initials, that he had ordered me to pay: "nine thousand seven hundred eighty-eight and 27/100 ($9,788.27) per year, one hundred eighty-eight and 23/100 ($188.23) [weekly]."
BUT MY EX-WIFE'S ATTORNEY SIMPLY REMOVED THE 3RD PAGE OF THE ORIGINAL DIVORCE JUDGMENT THAT JUDGE MALOY ACTUALLY SIGNED AND WHERE HE MADE THOSE CHANGES - AND SHE REPLACED THAT PAGE WITH A DIFFERENT COPY OF THE 3RD PAGE WHICH ONLY INCLUDED THE HIGHER AMOUNT THAT THEY PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED - WHICH WAS DOUBLE THE AMOUNT THAT JUDGE MALOY ACTUALLY CALCULATED AND ORDERED ME TO PAY!!!
INVESTED IN INJUSTICE
An esteemed and insightful American once stated:
"The Cover-up is often worse than the crime"
Obviously, it is a clear case of "CONTEMPT OF COURT" if/when anyone deliberately ignores or blatantly violates a court order. So, because of the fact that my ex-wife did just that by blatantly and maliciously totally alienating our children from me (and using them as weapons against me) by scheming to terminate my "Supervised Visits", AND, by staunchly refusing to allow me to speak to our children on the telephone, AND, by confiscating all of the mail that I sent to our children and steadfastly refusing to allow our children to receive any mail from me or to send me any mail - all of which was clearly stipulated in her own Order of Protection from the Family Court - I filed what is called a "VIOLATION PETITION" with the Family Court because of the fact that my ex-wife was blatantly violating those stipulations in an order that the Family Court issued. Seems clear and simple does'nt it?
At the same time, I also filed an additional petition for "Custody/Visitation" and a third petition for "Child Support Modification", all in the Family Court. And I filed a petition in the NYS Supreme Court to vacate my ex-wife's [fraudulent] "Default" Divorce Judgment - SO THAT ACTUAL DIVORCE AND CUSTODY HEARINGS WOULD WE HELD AND SO THAT I WOULD BE ALLOWED TO GIVE MY SIDE OF THE STORY AND SO THAT THE MATTER OF "CUSTODY" OF EVAN & ETHAN WOULD BE DETERMINED BASED ON THE THE MERITS (THE FACTS AND EVIDENCE).
Naturally, a couple weeks after I filed the aforementioned petitions, my ex-wife and her attorney responded to my petitions by filing woefully FRIVOLOUS and clearly retaliatory petitions against me claiming that I violated the stipulations in my ex-wife's Order of Protection by allegedly 'speaking innapropriately to [our children] during our telephone conversations with our children' (which, they claimed, is the reason why my ex-wife stopped allowing me to speak to our children via the telephone); And they also admitted that my ex-wife "confiscated" all of the mail that I sent (send) to our children and refuses to give our children any mail from me because, they claimed, the contents of all of my mail to our children is also "inappropriate". And they simply requested that my petition for "Child Support Modification" and my petition to the NYS Supreme Court to vacate my ex-wife's [fraudulent] "Default" Divorce Judgment should be "Dismissed."
The Law Guardian, Lisa Sadinsky, naturally continued to side completely with my ex-wife and her attorney. And I repeatedly stressed to the court the fact that MY EX-WIFE HAD, IN FACT, TAPE-RECORDED EACH AND EVERY ONE OF MY TELEPHONE CONVERSATIONS WITH EVAN AND ETHAN - but they repeatedly refused to provide or release the taped-recordings and transcripts of those telephone conversations - even though my ex-wife and her attorney and the Law Guardian were all [falsely] claiming that I spoke inappropriately to my children during those telephone conversations! They utterly ignored my repeated "Demand(s) to Produce" that vital and obviously relevant "EVIDENCE" under the rules of "Discovery" - And the Family Court has continually allowed them to do so.
The Family Court's Judicial Hearing Officer, Glen R. Morton, presided over the hearings pertaining to my "Violation Petition" (and my ex-wife's retaliatory Violation Petition) - And HE is the J.H.O. that previously included the aforementioned stipulations in my ex-wife's Order of Protection - HOWEVER, SINCE THE "BIGOT'S BRIGADE" IS ESSENTIALLY BASED IN THE MONROE COUNTY FAMILY COURT, AND THE FAMILY COURT IS COMPLETELY INVESTED IN THIS INJUSTICE - J.H.O. MORTON OFFICIALLY SANCTIONED THE TOTAL PARENTAL ALIENATION AND "DENIED" MY VIOLATION PETITION AGAINST MY EX-WIFE! - His assinine and simple-minded reason was that, since the original petition and Order of Protection was awarded to my ex-wife - SHE is the only person that can file a violation petition based on that court order and any of the stipulations therein. He did not cite or in any way reprimand my ex-wife for "Contempt of Court" for blatantly violating the stipulations that he himself previously included in her Order of Protection!
Ironically, he also "DENIED" my ex-wife's frivolous and clearly retaliatory "Violation Petition" - But, even though J.H.O. Morton officially "Denied" my ex-wife's "Violation Petition", he still clearly manifested his - and the Family Courts - blatant bias on behalf of my ex-wife, and he did my ex-wife and her attorney ANOTHER favor - (while also attempting to cover his feces-covered face and butt) - BECAUSE HE TOOK THE INITIATIVE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OF THE STIPULATIONS REGARDING MY CONTACT WITH EVAN AND ETHAN, except the "Supervised Visits" at the S.P.C.C. - which he knew had already been terminated because I refused to accept their discriminatory and draconian conditions that I had to stop giving my children "GIFTS" (including "BOOKS" and "CLOTHES") etc.!
The hearings pertaining to my petition for CUSTODY/VISITATION was presided over by yet another one of the Family Court's woefully inept and Judicial Hearing Officers, Paul Miles. That pseudo "hearing" seemed to last less than five (5) minutes, during which he simply asked my ex-wife to respond to my petition and then he "DISMISSED" the petition without even asking or allowing me to speak!
To be continued... (and coming soon: "Ain't fallin' for those Alec Baldwin-like - MISDIRECTED ANGER lures!" and; "It's all about the Bigots - AND THE BENJAMINS!" and; "How Bigots Congregate like Cockroaches ~ And LIGHT (The TRUTH) also causes THEM to scatter"
